VAT pitfalls and traps on Property Sales in Zimbabwe

by with No Comment News

Understanding the intricate details of Value Added Tax (VAT) in property transactions is critical for both buyers and sellers in Zimbabwe’s property market. Ignoring the complex nuances of Value Added Tax (VAT) can lead to severe financial consequences, placing immense pressure on both sellers and buyers. The stakes are high and a lack of diligence could result in unexpected costs that may destabilize financial outcomes and cash flows.

According to the VAT Act, the sale of immovable property by a registered operator is generally considered a taxable supply, meaning that VAT is due unless the property qualifies for specific exemptions. However, the application of VAT is not straightforward. For VAT to apply, the property must be a trade asset and used in the course or furtherance of the seller’s trade. The term “trade” is critical; for VAT purposes, it refers to activities involving the production of taxable supplies. Therefore, when an operator is involved in producing 100% exempt supplies, any property sold by them is exempt from VAT. This provision underscores the importance of understanding the nature of the property being sold, as VAT liability depends on its use in taxable activities. This means that VAT is only applicable when a registered operator sells a trade asset.

Exemptions do exist under the VAT Act, but they are narrow and specific and require precise documentation. For instance, property acquired before 1 January 2004 by a natural person, used primarily as a private residence, and for which no input tax deduction was claimed, may qualify for exemption. The VAT Act is unforgiving in its application, imposing strict conditions for exemptions and offering no leniency in cases of non-compliance. Properties deemed non-taxable, such as those acquired for non-trading activities or sold by non-registered operators, still require accurate documentation. Failure to meet these conditions can lead to substantial VAT liability, severely impacting the financial standing of the seller or buyer.

The risk intensifies for properties used in both taxable and non-taxable supplies. Registered operators must exercise caution when selling such properties, as the VAT Act deems them as being used in the furtherance of trade, requiring VAT to be paid in full upon sale. This rule applies even if the property was partially used for non-trading activities. Additionally, if property is sold to satisfy a debt and the original owner does not provide written confirmation that the sale is non-taxable, the VAT Act mandates that the transaction be treated as one in the furtherance of trade, thus subjecting it to VAT. Involuntary sales, such as those conducted under a power of sale, can also attract VAT if not properly documented. This is a critical trap that could ensnare those unaware of the intricate legal requirements, leading to significant, unexpected VAT liabilities.

The situation becomes even more precarious when dealing with deregistration. Upon deregistration, any goods or rights that remain part of trade assets are considered supplied immediately before deregistration, potentially triggering VAT unless specific exemptions apply. This rule also applies to fixed property, meaning that VAT could be triggered upon deregistration unless specific exemptions apply.

The sale of a “going concern” introduces another layer of complexity. For a transaction to qualify for zero-rating under VAT, it must involve the transfer of at least 51% of the trade, with both buyer and seller being VAT-registered. There must be a written agreement confirming the sale as a going concern and the business must continue operating in the same manner post-sale. A failure to meet these conditions could result in a significant and unexpected VAT liabilities, undermining the entire transaction. This provision is crucial for taxpayers to consider when structuring the sale of a business as a going concern which involves transfer of property.

Given the complexities involved, sellers and buyers must remain vigilant to avoid the significant financial setbacks that can arise from mishandling VAT on property sales. Without careful planning and strict adherence to the law, the financial consequences could be devastating. Sellers and buyers alike must approach transactions with a thorough understanding of their VAT responsibilities to avoid pitfalls that could lead to substantial VAT implications.

Adapting Zimbabwe’s Assessment Year to New Economic Realities

by with No Comment News

The recent introduction of the Zimbabwean Gold (ZIG) currency on April 5, 2024, has prompted significant changes across Zimbabwe’s financial landscape. Among these is the proposed adjustment to the year of assessment for taxable income from employment. This proposal, put forth by the Minister of Finance, Economic Development, and Investment Promotion, seeks to divide the 2024 tax year into two distinct periods: January 1 to April 4, 2024, and April 5 to December 31, 2024. This change is designed to align tax periods with the ZIG’s introduction and to streamline tax administration during this pivotal economic transition. This article explores the details and implications of the proposal, as well as its alignment with the Income Tax Act [Chapter 23:06].

The ZIG currency’s introduction represents a transformative shift in Zimbabwe’s economy, requiring careful adjustments across various sectors. The proposed split in the 2024 tax year addresses this need by creating two separate tax periods. The first period, from January 1 to April 4, 2024, represents the final stage of the old currency regime. The second period, starting on April 5, 2024, coincides with the adoption of the ZIG and extends to December 31, 2024. This bifurcation aims to provide clear demarcation between the two economic phases, simplifying tax compliance for individuals and businesses and ensuring that income earned under the old and new currency regimes is accurately assessed.

The legal framework governing income tax assessment and collection in Zimbabwe is provided by the Income Tax Act [Chapter 23:06]. Under this Act, the “year of assessment” is traditionally defined as a 12-month period beginning on January 1. However, the Act permits adjustments to the assessment year under certain conditions, particularly during significant economic changes. The proposed split for 2024 follows this precedent, aiming to align tax assessment periods with the introduction of the ZIG. Key sections of the Income Tax Act relevant to this proposal include provisions on the levy and calculation of income tax and the interpretation of taxable income. These sections ensure that income earned before and after the ZIG’s introduction is assessed fairly and with precision, minimizing the risks of mistiming or misalignment.

For employees and businesses, this adjustment necessitates careful attention to detail. Employees must ensure that their income is accurately reported for each of the two tax periods in 2024. This may require modifications to payroll systems to accommodate the split assessment periods. Employers, too, will need to issue separate tax certificates for each period, adding complexity to the tax reporting process. For businesses, the proposed change demands a thorough review and adjustment of accounting and tax reporting processes. Income and expenses incurred before and after the ZIG’s introduction must be meticulously separated and reported to ensure compliance and avoid penalties. Accurate record-keeping will be essential to navigate this transition smoothly.

The government, for its part, will need to undertake significant updates to its tax administration systems. This includes modifying tax forms, updating software systems, and providing clear guidance to taxpayers and tax practitioners on the new requirements. The transition, while involving additional administrative costs, is expected to yield long-term benefits by facilitating a smoother shift to the new currency regime. By splitting the 2024 tax year, the government aims to enhance clarity and compliance in tax reporting, reducing the risk of errors and disputes with tax authorities.

While the proposal presents short-term challenges, particularly in terms of administrative adjustments, its long-term impact is likely to be positive. The ability to accurately assess and collect taxes will bolster the government’s revenue base, providing essential funds for public services and infrastructure development. Moreover, by ensuring that income earned under the old and new currency regimes is separately assessed, the government can maintain a fair and equitable tax system that reflects the realities of the country’s evolving economic landscape.

In conclusion, the proposed adjustment to the year of assessment, following the introduction of the ZIG, represents a strategic move designed to facilitate the transition to the new currency and streamline tax administration processes. By splitting the 2024 tax year, the government seeks to clarify tax reporting requirements and enhance compliance, in line with the provisions of the Income Tax Act [Chapter 23:06]. For taxpayers, this change necessitates careful adjustments to payroll and accounting systems, while for the government, it provides a more precise framework for tax assessment and collection.

Fuel Transit Rules Threaten Business Liquidity

by with No Comment News

A bold policy from Zimbabwe’s Minister of Finance, Economic Development and Investment Promotion’s Mid-Term Budget Review on how duty and levies on fuel imported under Removal in Transit (RIT) are handled came into effect on 10 August 2024, following the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) public announcement. According to the new regulation, duty and levies on fuel must be paid upfront at the port of entry, with reimbursement at the port of exit upon compliance with all transit procedures, including submission of proof that the fuel has been exported. The policy mandates that all types of fuel, including petrol, diesel, paraffin, and Jet A1, transported by road through Zimbabwe are subject to these new duties. This measure excludes entities sourcing fuel directly from the National Oil Infrastructure Company of Zimbabwe (NOIC) at the Msasa Depot or other entities approved by the Minister.

The upfront payment requirement is designed to minimize the risk of fuel being diverted for local consumption without proper duty payments, a practice that has led to significant revenue losses in the past. ZIMRA has been grappling with transit fraud for years, and while the Electronic Cargo Tracking System (ECTS), introduced in 2017, was a step forward, it has not entirely resolved the issue. This new regulation seeks to address these shortcomings by aligning with the Customs and Excise Act [Chapter 23:02], which mandates that all goods, including fuel, pass through designated ports for proper recording and monitoring. The Act empowers the Commissioner to establish transit sheds and customs areas for secure storage and examination of goods and grants the Minister authority to implement regulations ensuring compliance and protecting revenue.

However, significant concerns have emerged regarding the efficiency and practicality of the refund process, especially in light of ZIMRA’s existing challenges with VAT refunds. The requirement for upfront payment of duties and levies places an immediate financial burden on businesses that may already be operating on thin margins. ZIMRA’s public notice explicitly states, “Consignees and/or their representatives should approach ZIMRA at the port of entry to initiate the fuel clearance and payment process. For the refund process, once the fuel has been exported they should approach ZIMRA at the port of exit to initiate the requisite refund process.” Under the Customs and Excise Act, goods are deemed exported when all border formalities are completed. This is the time when the bill of entry or other export document is delivered to and stamped by an officer at the port of exit or when the goods cross the borders of Zimbabwe, whichever is earlier. This process could realistically take at least three days from the time the goods enter and to when they exit Zimbabwe.

For many, this upfront cost could make Zimbabwe an unattractive transit route, especially when alternative routes, such as the Kazungula border, offer less financially onerous options. The administrative burden associated with the refund process cannot be overlooked, as it involves multiple verification steps at both the port of entry and the port of exit, risking delays and bottlenecks that further complicate the supply chain and increase costs for businesses. Given Zimbabwe’s deteriorating road network, challenging geography, and significant traffic volumes, transit through the country has become increasingly difficult for Southern African transporters. The combination of stringent speed regulations, slow ZIMRA payment approvals, and the heavy burden of road user fees further complicates the route. These factors, coupled with stringent practices by traffic police and prolonged customs procedures, often drive businesses to explore alternative, more efficient routes, undermining Zimbabwe’s position as a key transit hub.

Instead of relying solely on upfront payments, the government could consider enhancing existing measures by improving the current tracking systems, designating specific stop areas for transit vehicles, and refining the sealing of transit goods.

While ZIMRA emphasizes that these measures are crucial to combat transit fraud, the broader implications for business liquidity and regional trade dynamics remain a significant concern. This situation risks undermining the objectives of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), which aims to facilitate regional trade by opening borders and reducing trade barriers. Instead of promoting seamless trade across the continent, Zimbabwe’s new policy could inadvertently encourage businesses to bypass the country entirely, leading to a reduction in transit traffic and associated economic benefits.

Adding to the complexity, the premature publication of the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority’s (ZIMRA) Public Notice has raised legal and constitutional concerns within the business community, particularly because it was issued without the backing of Statutory Instruments (SI) or any supporting legislation. The notice cites the Minister’s Mid-Term Budget Review Statement as the basis for these new rules, but no formal legal framework was in place at the time of its publication. This move follows a recent Supreme Court decision in the Zimplats vs. ZIMRA case, where the court upheld the legal force of ZIMRA’s Public Notices. This development raises concerns about ZIMRA’s expanding role, potentially overstepping its authority as it encroaches on legislative functions—a reality that must be examined against the Constitution. It also warrants scrutiny to ensure that the Supreme Court’s decision is not taken out of context.

Tougher VAT deferment Rules looming

by with No Comment News

In a significant move to tighten tax regulations, Zimbabwe’s Finance Ministry has proposed amendments to the regulations governing the deferment of Value Added Tax (VAT). These changes introduce new penalties aimed at ensuring that businesses and individuals promptly adhere to their tax obligations, reduce tax evasion, and enhance revenue collection.

The proposal introduces two key penalties. First, taxpayers who fail to pay deferred VAT by the set deadline will lose the privilege of future deferments. The same applies to operators who have previously failed to honour their VAT obligations on deferred taxes. Second, taxpayers who default on any taxes under specific legislation, including the Capital Gains Tax Act, Customs and Excise Act, Income Tax Act, and VAT Act, will also be barred from future VAT deferments. The Finance Ministry has emphasized that no further tax concessions will be granted to operators who have previously defaulted on their VAT obligations, including taxes due on other tax heads. This move is intended to enforce punctuality among beneficiaries of the VAT deferment facility, ensuring that revenue is safeguarded, and tax compliance is maintained across all sectors. The proposals further require applications for VAT deferment to be accompanied by a statement from the Commissioner-General of the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) confirming the operator’s compliance with their tax obligations. This may necessitate a tax audit before the granting of deferment. A Tax Clearance Certificate alone will not be accepted as sufficient evidence of compliance.

Currently, the deferment incentive is granted to businesses in sectors such as mining, manufacturing, medical, and agriculture in respect of plant and machinery importation for their own use, supported by letters from the Minister of Finance and the relevant line ministry. The deferment period is fixed at a maximum of 180 days, with a minimum capital goods value of US$1,000,000. In response, the Minister has proposed extending the deferment period to up to two years for operators in the manufacturing sector and up to three years for operators in the mining sector. This focus on mining and manufacturing acknowledges the capital-intensive nature of these sectors, where large-scale investments require substantial upfront costs and longer timelines before equipment becomes operational. These extended periods are designed to align with the unique financial cycles of these industries, which often differ from other sectors that might feel excluded from such benefits.

However, the US$1,000,000 threshold, while targeting significant investments, also restricts access for many businesses, particularly SMEs. This high barrier may render the deferment facility more theoretical than practical for smaller players, potentially stifling growth in industries where smaller capital investments are more common.

For businesses, these regulations will require stricter adherence to tax deadlines to avoid losing deferment privileges, which could impact cash flow management. Companies may need to enhance their financial planning and internal controls to ensure compliance. While this could pose challenges, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), the measures are intended to create a level playing field by eliminating advantages for those evading taxes. These proposed VAT penalties are a crucial step toward strengthening tax compliance and enhancing the efficiency of Zimbabwe’s tax system. While there may be short-term challenges for businesses, the long-term impact on the economy is expected to be positive.

Your Tax Obligation When Working for a Foreign-Based Employer

by with No Comment News

The digitalisation of work, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has enabled people to work globally, often for foreign-based employers while residing in their home countries. This shift offers numerous advantages, such as access to a diverse talent pool and potential cost reductions for employers. However, it also introduces complex tax implications for employees residing in Zimbabwe. This article provides an overview of the tax obligations for such employees, emphasising compliance with local laws to avoid legal issues and ensure fiscal contributions to the national economy.

Zimbabwe employs a source-based tax system, stipulating that taxes are due on income earned from activities conducted within its borders. This system is underpinned by the principle established in the tax case of CIR v Lever Brothers and Unilever Ltd, which establishes that the source of income is tied to the location and cause of income generation. For employees in Zimbabwe working this means any income earned for services rendered locally is subject to taxation by the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) despite the residence status of the employer.

For compliance, both resident and non-resident employers must register with ZIMRA within 14 days of employing someone above the tax-free threshold. Non-resident employers are further required to appoint a resident representative to handle Pay As You Earn (PAYE) obligations. If a foreign employer fails to register, the responsibility to ensure tax compliance falls on the employee, who must then file a tax return and directly pay the taxes due to ZIMRA. This process is crucial in preventing tax evasion and ensuring that income generated within Zimbabwe contributes to national revenue.7 

The enforcement of these tax obligations is strengthened by stringent banking regulations such the requirement of proof of the source of funds among other requirements. These measures are designed to curb money laundering and ensure comprehensive tax compliance, crucial for maintaining financial transparency. The implementation of these regulations has significant implications for both businesses and the economy. Foreign employers must navigate these local tax laws and administrative duties, potentially increasing operational burdens but crucial for legal compliance and smooth business operations. For the Zimbabwean economy, rigorous enforcement of tax laws ensures a fair tax system and equitable contribution to national revenues, which are vital for public services and infrastructure development.

 

In conclusion, the global shift towards remote work requires employees in Zimbabwe working for foreign-based employers to diligently comply with local tax laws. Understanding and adhering to these obligations not only avoids legal repercussions but also supports Zimbabwe’s economic stability and development. Both employees and employers must be well-informed about these regulations to ensure seamless financial transactions and contributions to the country’s fiscal health.

VAT on Imported Services

by with No Comment News

The Value Added Tax (VAT) on Imported Services (VIS) in Zimbabwe ensures that services procured from non-resident persons and persons operating their business outside Zimbabwe and consumed by residents are taxed similarly to those supplied by local providers. This article explores the background, relevant laws, detailed VAT regulations, and the impact of VIS on businesses and the economy.

VIS applies to services imported into Zimbabwe and consumed or utilised by residents. The standard VAT rate is 15%. The tax obligation arises upon the earliest of three events: issuance of an invoice, payment to the non-resident provider, or completion of the service. Taxpayers must remit the tax by the 25th of the month following the supply, and they may reclaim VIS if the services contribute directly to taxable supplies. VAT on imported services may be paid in local currency.

The value of imported services is either the consideration paid or the open market value, whichever is greater. The ZIMRA typically applies 15% on the consideration. Barter or donation is valued at the open market value, and a supply for no consideration has nil value unless between connected persons. Meanwhile, imported services similar those ordinarily zero-rated or exempted by local suppliers are exempted from VAT for instance actuary, insurance, medical services, financial guarantee, or suretyship. 

Reclaiming VIS involves complex documentation and compliance requirements. Taxpayers can offset the tax paid against their VAT liabilities if the imported services are used directly in the production of taxable supplies.

The requirement to remit VAT by the 25th of the following month creates a strict timeline for compliance. Businesses must ensure they have the necessary funds and documentation to meet this deadline, failing which they may face penalties and interest charges. The option to pay VIS in local currency provides flexibility, particularly for businesses that may not have easy access to foreign currency.

 

In conclusion, implementing VIS has significant implications for businesses, particularly those that frequently engage with international service providers. While the ability to reclaim VIS offers some relief, the requirement to prepay the tax can strain cash flows, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) lacking financial resources. Complex conditions for claiming VAT refunds pose additional challenges, requiring detailed records and stringent documentation to reclaim VIS successfully. This administrative burden can be particularly onerous for smaller enterprises, lacking the capacity to manage these processes effectively.

The New Face of Income Tax Computation

by with No Comment News

The introduction of Section 37AA of the Income Tax Act (ITA) through Finance Act No. 8 of 2022, and the mandate to lodge income tax returns via the Tax and Revenue Management System (TARMS) in Zimbabwean dollars (ZiG), has significantly transformed the landscape of income tax computation in Zimbabwe. This transformation presents both new challenges and complexities, requiring a deep understanding from taxpayers about the implications of these changes. This article explores these changes, clarifies the legislation, and analyses its impact on businesses and the broader economy.

Section 37AA of the ITA mandates taxpayers who earn any portion of their income from trade or investments in foreign currencies to file a separate return in foreign currency. This provision further requires the splitting and allocation of deductions and allowances between returns filed in local and foreign currencies, based on an income ratio. To facilitate computation of income ratio currencies are converted to a common denominator using the average auction rate for the year. The transition from Zimbabwean dollars (ZWL) to  ZiG requires an extension of the income tax computation template to show the conversion of the ZWL return into ZiG. The ZIMRA Public Notice 41 provides guidance on the exchange rate to use for converting ZWL returns to ZiG. The expected format for the 2023 tax return reflects these changes, including income statements in ZWL and USD, and the corresponding tax computations in ZiG. 

This dual reporting requirement ensures that taxable income is accurately reflected in the currency in which it was earned, enhancing fairness and consistency in tax computations. It underscores the importance of accurate record-keeping and precise currency conversions. The tax computation process has shifted to begin with the identification of gross income directly from records in their original currency, moving away from the traditional net profit before tax. Taxpayers must now extract gross income from their records, strip away any exemptions, determine the income ratio, and apply this ratio to their reported deductions and allowances, which must be submitted separately for each currency.

These new mandates introduce complexities that significantly raise the risk of non-compliance, especially for small businesses. Companies are compelled to modify their accounting systems to accurately record all transactions in both local and foreign currencies. This requirement for detailed record-keeping and precise currency conversions can pose substantial challenges, particularly for entities lacking in resources or expertise. The complexity inherent in these new reporting standards could potentially escalate operational costs, as businesses might need to engage tax professionals to navigate the new requirements.

From an economic perspective, while the dual reporting mechanism aims to increase tax accuracy and transparency, reflecting the true scope of economic activities and income of taxpayers, it may pose increased administrative burden on businesses, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with limited resources.

In conclusion, the changes introduced by Section 37AA of the ITA and the requirement to lodge income returns in TARMS in ZiG represent a significant shift in the income tax computation landscape. While these changes aim to improve tax accuracy and transparency, they also introduce new complexities and challenges for taxpayers. Meticulous planning, detailed record-keeping, and possibly expert guidance are now more crucial than ever to navigate this new tax landscape effectively.

Schemes of Reconstruction and Capital Gains Tax

by with No Comment News

In Zimbabwe’s dynamic corporate finance sphere, schemes of reconstruction serve as vital mechanisms, particularly in an environment marked by frequent and impactful economic transformations. These schemes, which include mergers, takeovers, consolidations, and conversions, provide structured pathways for businesses to optimize operations and strategic alignment while minimizing tax burdens. Specific provisions within Zimbabwe’s Capital Gains Tax (CGT) legislation provide clear guidelines and tax reliefs, encouraging and supporting such transformations for both local and foreign companies. This article delves into the intricacies of these tax provisions, explaining their mechanisms, beneficiaries, and contextual conditions, giving companies insight on how to leverage tax laws for enhanced corporate structuring and financial health.

Firstly, the CGT laws provides a beneficial pathway to non-resident companies operating in Zimbabwe through branches or permanent establishments in converting into Zimbabwean incorporated entities. This provision permits the transfer of specified assets to the new local company at base cost, thereby avoiding capital gains tax. To qualify, companies must elect this option before submitting their CGT return. For example, a foreign manufacturing firm could localize by incorporating in Zimbabwe and transferring its plant’s assets tax-free, enhancing investment appeal by reducing fiscal barriers.

The CGT legislation also facilitates tax-free transfers of specified assets between related companies, aiding corporate restructuring. Assets transferred at base cost within the corporate group allow for efficient reorganization, promoting strategic consolidation and realignment without tax consequences. For example, Company A could transfer technology to Company B within the same corporate group, optimizing asset utilization without immediate tax implications.

Yet a similar relief is when a company converts into or from Private Business Corporations (PBCs) or vice versa. This result in deferring of capital gains tax on involved assets, enhancing financial flexibility. To benefit, the company or PBC must elect this option before filing their capital gains tax return. Assets must remain within the corporate entity until sold externally to qualify for this deferment. An example is a software development company transitioning to a PBC, which can use its existing assets without incurring immediate capital gains tax, thereby offering flexibility and financial relief. This provision supports companies in adapting to evolving economic and regulatory conditions.

The capital gains tax legislation also enables a tax-efficient “share-for-share transaction,” crucial for corporate restructuring. This provision allows companies to reorganize ownership by exchanging securities without monetary consideration and without incurring immediate capital gains tax. To qualify for tax relief, transfers must be part of an approved reconstruction scheme, such as a merger or consolidation. Companies must elect this option before filing their capital gains tax return. This strategy supports corporate objectives such as operational consolidation or preparation for acquisitions by realigning business operations without incurring capital gains taxes. For instance, Company X, with underutilized patents, can exchange them for shares with Company Y, enhancing asset utilization across the corporate group without immediate tax implications.

The Act also offers a unique approach to managing capital gains tax in spousal transactions, enabling tax deferment or elimination on specified asset transfers. This provision holds critical importance for financial planning and asset management within marriages. Transfers between spouses, whether joint or individual, are valued at the base cost, thus avoiding immediate capital gain or loss recognition. This facilitates tax-free asset reorganization within marriages. However, to benefit, spouses must elect this provision during tax filing and maintain it while married. The tax implications may shift significantly during divorce, yet the relief can still apply if transfers comply with divorce settlement requirements. For instance, spouses exchanging assets such as a painting for a stock portfolio at base costs can diversify holdings without incurring additional taxes, offering flexibility in asset management. This provision supports financial adjustments and equitable asset distribution during and after marriages.

Securing approval from the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) is crucial for realizing tax reliefs associated with schemes of reconstruction. Compliance with documentation and procedural requirements ensures the smooth implementation of restructuring activities, safeguarding the interests of companies and preventing disputes or delays. Understanding and navigating Zimbabwe’s schemes of reconstruction and associated tax provisions are essential for businesses undergoing significant restructuring. These mechanisms, supported by ZIMRA’s approval, contribute to business growth, strategic realignment, and economic efficiency in a regulatory-friendly environment.

Independent Contractors from a taxman’s perspective

by with No Comment News

An independent contractor is a person or entity contracted to perform services for another entity as a non-employee, which offers a higher degree of autonomy than traditional employment. Contractors decide their own work hours, methods, and often juggle multiple clients. They shoulder their own business expenses and must supply their own tools and resources. As non-employees, independent contractors do not enjoy employee benefits such as health insurance, paid leave, or workers’ compensation. The legal obligations they face, especially concerning taxes, are distinct; they must pay income tax on their earnings and often need to make quarterly estimated tax payments. If their annual earnings exceed thresholds of USD 40,000, they must also register for and pay Value Added Tax (VAT), adding significant administrative responsibilities to maintain meticulous financial records. 

The distinction between an independent contractor and an employee is crucial and is analyzed under various legislative frameworks such as the Income Tax Act, the Labour Act, and common law criteria. The Income Tax Act specifies that an independent contractor conducts their trade independently, not being economically dependent on the payer, including roles such as labour brokers and freelance agents. They manage their tax obligations through Quarterly Declarations (QDs) and pay VAT when turnover surpasses USD 40,000, emphasizing the need for them to maintain comprehensive records of their financial transactions.

The Labour Act focuses on the relationship dynamics, defining an ’employee’ as someone economically dependent on their employer, typically not applicable to independent contractors. However, there are exceptions based on the degree of investment or risk assumed by the hiring entity. The act emphasizes the level of control and dependency; substantial control by the hiring party suggests an employment relationship, whereas significant autonomy suggests an independent contractor status.

Common law introduces tests such as the supervision and control test, the organizational test, and the financial risk test to assess this status. These tests examine the authority over work execution, integration into business operations, and the financial risks borne by the worker. A comprehensive approach often employed is the multiple or dominant impression test, which considers all factors to determine the overarching relationship nature.

When engaging an independent contractor, it’s essential to structure contracts and documentation clearly to avoid legal ambiguities, particularly concerning tax and employment laws. A well-crafted contract should clarify that the contractor is not an employee and specify the responsibilities, deliverables, and payment terms. It is critical to avoid language implying employment and instead highlight the independent nature of the contractor’s work. Contractors should provide proof of their business status, such as a business licence or professional indemnity insurance, to substantiate their independence. Maintaining records of all communications and ensuring invoices are issued for services can reinforce the business-to-business relationship, crucial for tax purposes.

Freelance agents, such as insurance brokers or real estate negotiators, operate under specific regulations that set them apart from other contractors, often representing multiple clients enhancing their independent status. These agents are subject to distinct tax requirements, including a 20% withholding tax deducted from their gross commissions, which must be remitted to the relevant tax authority by the 10th day of the following month along with a specific tax return form. They also manage their income tax through Quarterly Provisional Tax Declarations, similar to other independent contractors. Freelance agents receive a certificate from the payer indicating the commission amount and tax withheld, enabling them to claim a tax credit when filing annual returns. To ensure compliance and uphold their independent status, freelance agents must maintain thorough records of all transactions, commissions, and taxes paid. They should also possess all necessary licenses and insurances for legal operation, regularly updating contracts to accurately reflect the nature of their work relationship and mitigate potential legal and tax complications.

Understanding the nuances between independent contractors and employees is vital for both parties involved. This clarity helps maximize the benefits of flexibility and potential tax advantages inherent in independent contracting, ensuring compliance and avoiding misclassification and the associated liabilities. For businesses, diligent contract structuring and adherence to legal standards are essential, while contractors must effectively manage their tax obligations and maintain their entrepreneurial independence to thrive in this dynamic working landscape.

Aligning Tax Laws with IFRS 17: Implications for Insurance Sector

by with No Comment News

IFRS 17, issued in May 2017, replaces IFRS 4, governing accounting for insurance contracts from 1 January 2023. It shifts from a premium-centric to a service delivery and risk release model, aiming for a more accurate reflection of insurer performance and revenue recognition timing. It further standardizes reporting with expected value and current value measurement principles, enhancing transparency, comparability, and consistency. IFRS 17 introduces significant changes, including the Premium Allocation Approach (PAA) and the Contractual Service Margin (CSM). The PAA simplifies accounting for contracts that meet specific criteria by spreading the expected premium revenue over the coverage period. Meanwhile, the CSM represents unearned profit in an insurance contract and is recognized in the income statement as obligations are fulfilled, aligning profit recognition with insurance coverage.

This transition represents a significant overhaul of accounting practices for insurance contracts, with substantial implications for tax reporting. Without adjustments to tax laws, insurers will need to align accounts prepared using IFRS 17 with current tax reporting, potentially involving complex reconciliations and adjustments to tax liabilities. Continuing under IFRS 4 may avoid these complexities but would require maintaining dual reporting systems. For example, under current tax laws, short-term insurance is taxed on an adjusted cash basis, where premiums and incomes such as reinsurance commissions and investment returns are recorded when received. Reinsurance premiums are deducted when paid, and claims when incurred, while technical reserves, except for unexpired risk reserves, are not allowed as income tax deductions. These elements are typically accessible from the accounting records, except for technical reserves, which are actuarially determined. However, using IFRS 17, which relies heavily on actuarial calculations and shifts focus from premium receipt to service delivery, may challenge this approach and potentially erode trust from tax authorities in the short to medium term. This standard method of tax computation might be difficult to maintain with accounts prepared under IFRS 17, possibly leading to distrust from tax authorities in the short to medium term.

Many key elements in the financial statements under IFRS 17, such as insurance services revenue, reinsurance services revenue, and insurance contract liabilities and receivables, are largely calculated by actuaries. The shift in source and terminology under IFRS 17 complicates tax assessments and assimilation, as it focuses on delivering insurance services rather than just receiving premiums. This change could shift the timing of revenue recognition, significantly diverging from current tax treatments under the ITA, which align more closely with cash flows and premium receipts. Further, IFRS 17’s immediate recognition of losses could potentially reduce taxable income, presenting further challenges for tax authorities. It is vital to amend the ITA to align tax deductions with the financial recognition of these losses, to prevent mismatches in tax reporting and financial accounting.

As the insurance industry prepares for the implementation of IFRS 17, it is imperative to consider specific amendments to the Income Tax Act (ITA) to ensure that tax legislation keeps pace with these significant changes in accounting standards. This alignment will ensure that Zimbabwe’s tax laws meet global financial reporting and taxation standards, enhancing the country’s appeal to international investors and ensuring consistent financial reporting for insurance companies. These amendments will eliminate ambiguity, minimize potential tax disputes, and lead to more predictable and equitable tax outcomes. Clarifying the law will help stakeholders understand their tax duties and the basis for their calculations, simplifying compliance and minimizing conflicts. More importantly, adjustments to the ITA should allow for the deferral of taxation on the Contractual Service Margin (CSM) until profits are actually realized, aligning tax obligations with actual earnings rather than anticipated profits. This ensures taxation reflects the actual economic activities rather than expected future profits. A further suggestion is that, losses should be immediately deductible for tax purposes. This would reflect their true economic impact and aid insurers in effective risk management.

In conclusion, the introduction of IFRS 17 represents a watershed moment for the insurance industry, necessitating significant adjustments in both accounting and taxation practices. Aligning the Income Tax Act with these new standards, ensures competitiveness, transparency, and financial stability within the Zimbabwe insurance sector. It is essential for policymakers and industry stakeholders to engage collaboratively to enact these changes, ensuring that the transition not only meets international standards but also supports the local market’s unique needs and conditions.